Burns v. Richardson

383 U.S. 902, 86 S. Ct. 881
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 21, 1966
DocketNo. 318; No. 323; No. 409
StatusPublished

This text of 383 U.S. 902 (Burns v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burns v. Richardson, 383 U.S. 902, 86 S. Ct. 881 (1966).

Opinion

Appeals from D. C. Hawaii. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 382 U. S. 807.) Motion of Harold S. Roberts for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion of Harold S. Roberts for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, denied.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
383 U.S. 902, 86 S. Ct. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-richardson-scotus-1966.