Bryant v. State

89 So. 3d 1073, 2012 WL 2012499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8919
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2012·No. No. 3D11-3366·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.Sd 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that “section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional”; rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 89 So. 3d 1073, 2012 WL 2012499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8919 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

89 So. 3d 1073 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beckles v. State
92 So. 3d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)