Beckles v. State
This text of 92 So. 3d 281 (Beckles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that “section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional”; rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which a federal court held that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Washington, — So.3d - (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Bryant v. State, 89 So.3d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Alvarez v. State, 88 So.3d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 So. 3d 281, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 2012 WL 2814121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckles-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.