Alvarez v. State

88 So. 3d 430, 2012 WL 1699330, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 2012
DocketNo. 3D12-510
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 So. 3d 430 (Alvarez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvarez v. State, 88 So. 3d 430, 2012 WL 1699330, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding “section 89.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional,” and rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beckles v. State
92 So. 3d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 So. 3d 430, 2012 WL 1699330, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.