Alvarez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alvarez v. State

88 So. 3d 430, 2012 WL 1699330, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2012·No. No. 3D12-510·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding “section 89.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional,” and rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722-23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding “section 89.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional,” and rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which federal court held section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).

Alvarez v. State, 88 So. 3d 430, 2012 WL 1699330, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

88 So. 3d 430 (Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related