Bryant v. State

622 So. 2d 620, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8460, 1993 WL 309021
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 577 So. 2d 1372
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 1993·No. No. 92-2395·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Appellant’s conviction for grand theft and his sentence as a habitual offender are affirmed; however, we remand to the lower court to delete all references in the probation order that pertain to consumption of alcohol or to testing or treatment for use of alcohol. A condition prohibiting the use of illegal drugs and providing for random testing for such drugs is proper, but there is no basis on this record to require appellant to undergo “drug offender probation” or drug treatment. Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); §§ 948.01(13), 948.03(1)0), Fla.Stat. (1991).

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 622 So. 2d 620, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8460, 1993 WL 309021 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 620 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biller v. State
618 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)