Bryant v. State
600 So. 2d 547, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7186, 1992 WL 135040
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 1992·No. No. 91-01655·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Larry H. Bryant raises two points in this appeal from a judgment and sentence for robbery and aggravated battery. We find no merit in the first point Appellant raises. Appellant’s second point is that the trial court erred in delegating its duty of determining the amount of restitution to a nonjudicial officer. O’Conner v. State, 587 So.2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Perry v. State, 513 So.2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The State conceded this was error. We agree, arid remand to the trial court to determine the amount of Appellant’s restitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryant v. State, 600 So. 2d 547, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7186, 1992 WL 135040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
600 So. 2d 547 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woods v. State
711 So. 2d 1182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Helton v. State
627 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)