Bryant v. State

550 So. 2d 541, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2494, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5926, 1989 WL 125708
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 546 So. 2d 762
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 1989·No. No. 89-0494·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. The findings made by the trial court satisfy the requirements of section 89.111(7)(c). The state concedes that the trial court imposed costs against appellant without notice and an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, on the authority of Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984), we reverse and vacate that part of the sentencing order which imposed costs on appellant and remand this case to the trial court with instructions to correct the order in accordance with this opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 550 So. 2d 541, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2494, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5926, 1989 WL 125708 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 541 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)