Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bryant v. State

559 So. 2d 414, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2487, 1990 WL 41224

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1990·No. No. 88-02740·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because we agree with the majority decision in Evans v. State, 543 So.2d 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), that separate convictions for possession of drug paraphernalia (a pipe) and possession of cocaine found in that pipe do not violate Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for possession of drug paraphernalia and cocaine.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because we agree with the majority decision in Evans v. State, 543 So.2d 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), that separate convictions for possession of drug paraphernalia (a pipe) and possession of cocaine found in that pipe do not violate Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for possession of drug paraphernalia and cocaine.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Bryant v. State, 559 So. 2d 414, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2487, 1990 WL 41224 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

559 So. 2d 414 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related