Bryan Smith v. State of Arkansas

2023 Ark. App. 209
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedApril 12, 2023
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 Ark. App. 209 (Bryan Smith v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryan Smith v. State of Arkansas, 2023 Ark. App. 209 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 209 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-22-460

Opinion Delivered April 12, 2023 BRYAN SMITH APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRAWFORD V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 17CR-19-980] STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE HONORABLE MICHAEL MEDLOCK, JUDGE

REMANDED TO SETTLE AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

A Crawford County jury convicted appellant Bryan Smith of attempted first-degree

battery of a law enforcement officer and fleeing and sentenced him as a habitual offender to

concurrent sentences of 480 months’ and 180 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant

challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the attempted-first-degree-battery

conviction. In addition, he challenges three evidentiary rulings, arguing that the circuit court

abused its discretion by allowing (1) the State to introduce proof of appellant’s failure to

appear as evidence of consciousness of guilt; (2) Trooper Roy Moomey to testify as to whether

Trooper John Bass was justified in his actions; and (3) Trooper Roy Moomey to testify as to

his opinion on appellant’s guilt. We remand to settle and supplement the record. At the conclusion of appellant’s trial, the court read from the verdict forms handed

by the jury foreperson to the bailiff in both the guilt and sentencing phases. Arkansas

Supreme Court Rule 3-4(c)(2) (2022) states that when there is a jury trial, the verdict forms

shall be inserted in the record. Those forms, however, are not included in the record of the

proceedings. This court has stated that if anything material to either party is omitted from

the record by error or accident, we may direct that the omission be corrected and that a

supplemental record be certified and transmitted. Perez v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 561, at 1–2;

Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(e) (as made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App. P.–Crim.

4(a)); see also Lacy v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 509. Accordingly, we remand to the circuit court

to settle and supplement the record with the jury-verdict forms. Appellant has thirty days

from the date of this opinion to file a supplemental record with this court.

Remanded to settle and supplement the record.

VIRDEN and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Erin W. Lewis, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Brooke Jackson Gasaway, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryan Smith v. State of Arkansas
2023 Ark. App. 513 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 Ark. App. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-smith-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2023.