Perez v. State

2015 Ark. App. 561
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 7, 2015
DocketCR-15-139
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2015 Ark. App. 561 (Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perez v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 561 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 561

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-15-139

Opinion Delivered OCTOBER 7, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE LONOKE RAMON PEREZ COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPELLANT [NO. CR-14-18]

V. HONORABLE SANDY HUCKABEE, JUDGE

STATE OF ARKANSAS REMANDED TO SUPPLEMENT THE APPELLEE RECORD; SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge

Appellant Ramon Perez was convicted in a jury trial of three counts of rape, one count

of second-degree sexual assault, and one count of aggravated assault on a family or household

member. For those convictions, Mr. Perez was sentenced to twenty-five years in prison. For

reversal, Mr. Perez argues that the trial court erred in admitting a videotaped forensic

interview with the alleged victim, which he asserts was inadmissible hearsay and deprived him

of the opportunity to effectively impeach the alleged victim with her prior inconsistent

statements. We remand for the record to be supplemented, and we order appellant to file a

supplemental addendum.

This court has stated that if anything material to either party is omitted from the record

by error or accident, we may direct that the omission be corrected and that a supplemental Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 561

record be certified and transmitted. Green v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 580; Ark. R. App. P.–Civ.

6(e) (as made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App. P.–Crim. 4(a)). Our review of the

record reveals that the jury-verdict forms are not contained therein. Accordingly, we remand

this case to the trial court to supplement the record with the jury-verdict forms. See Williams

v. State, 2011 Ark. 389. Appellant has thirty days from the date of this opinion to file a

supplemental record with this court.

In addition, pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i), in a case where

there was a jury trial, the jury-verdict forms must be included in the addendum. Because the

jury-verdict forms are not contained in appellant’s addendum, we order appellant to correct

this deficiency by filing a supplemental addendum within seven days after the supplemental

record has been filed. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(4).

Remanded to supplement the record; supplemental addendum ordered.

KINARD and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

Lightle, Raney, Streit & Streit, LLP, by: Jonathan R. Streit, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Ashley Driver Younger, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Christina Marziale v. Kimberly Brown
2024 Ark. App. 282 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2024)
Nicholas Lelieur v. State of Arkansas
2023 Ark. App. 240 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2023)
Bryan Smith v. State of Arkansas
2023 Ark. App. 209 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. App. 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perez-v-state-arkctapp-2015.