Bruno v. Ackerson

51 A.D.2d 1051, 381 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11871
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1051 (Bruno v. Ackerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bruno v. Ackerson, 51 A.D.2d 1051, 381 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating appellant Irving H. Greenwald as a candidate in the Republican Party primary election to be held on April 6, 1976 for the party position of State Committeeman in the 95th Assembly District, Rockland County, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s note of issue, is from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated March 15, 1976, which denied appellant’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding as untimely and for lack of jurisdiction. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and cross motion granted. The findings of fact are affirmed. The order to show cause and supporting papers which commenced the instant proceeding provided, inter alia, for service upon the appellant by (1) placing the said papers in the mail, and (2) affixing the order to show cause to the outer door of appellant’s residence, both to be done on or before March 4, 1976. Petitioner mailed the papers on March 4, 1976. However, instead of aflixing the order to show cause to the outer door of appellant’s residence as required by the terms of the order to show cause, petitioner had it personally delivered to appellant’s wife at appellant’s residence. While it can be argued that the latter method of service utilized by petitioner was a better mode of service (see CPLR 308, subd 2), the mode of service provided for in the order to show cause was jurisdictional in nature, and must be complied with (see Election Law, § 335). Accordingly, appellant’s cross motion to dismiss this proceeding for lack of jurisdiction should have been granted. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chetrit Group LLC v. Huey
2026 NY Slip Op 50183(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2026)
Matter of Lobban v. New York State Dept. of Health Vital Records
2024 NY Slip Op 51606(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2024)
Matter of Stark v. Williams
188 N.Y.S.3d 205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Felder v. Tischler
174 N.Y.S.3d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Rotanelli v. Board of Elections
109 A.D.3d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Rotanelli v. Westchester County Board of Elections
41 Misc. 3d 254 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Hernandez v. Mueller
29 Misc. 3d 522 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)
Jordan v. City of New York
38 A.D.3d 336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Marcoccia v. Garfinkle
307 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Phillips v. Sanfilippo
306 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Zambelli v. Dillon
242 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Mcgreevy v. Simon
220 A.D.2d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
DeVore v. Notice
185 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Bell v. State University of New York at Stony Brook
185 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Wilson v. Bush
175 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Keough v. Rothman
153 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Alamo v. Strohm
145 Misc. 2d 810 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
Moss v. D'Apice
138 A.D.2d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Zaretski v. Tutunjian
133 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Reilly v. Scaringe
133 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 1051, 381 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bruno-v-ackerson-nyappdiv-1976.