Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Keough v. Rothman

Keough v. Rothman

153 A.D.2d 768, 544 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11195
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 30, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 153 A.D.2d 768 (Keough v. Rothman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keough v. Rothman, 153 A.D.2d 768, 544 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

In a proceeding to validate a petition designating James P. Keough as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1989, for the public office of Councilmember from the 15th Councilmanic District of the City of New York, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated August 16, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see, Election Law § 16-116; Matter of Bruno v Ackerson, 51 AD2d 1051, affd 39 NY2d 718). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bruno v. Ackerson
349 N.E.2d 865 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Bruno v. Ackerson
51 A.D.2d 1051 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 A.D.2d 768, 544 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keough-v-rothman-nyappdiv-1989.