Brumfield v. Unknown Party

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedOctober 23, 2023
Docket2:23-cv-01659
StatusUnknown

This text of Brumfield v. Unknown Party (Brumfield v. Unknown Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brumfield v. Unknown Party, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Opinion

1 KM 2 WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Quaraii Rashad Brumfield, No. CV-23-01659-PHX-JAT (ASB) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Unknown, 13 Defendant.

14 15 On August 14, 2023, pro se Plaintiff Quaraii Rashad Brumfield, who was then 16 confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman, filed a document that appears to be 17 a civil complaint (“Complaint”). Plaintiff did not pay the $350.00 civil action filing fee 18 and $50.00 administrative fee or file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. 19 In other cases before the Court, Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Change of Address 20 indicating he is no longer in custody.1 The Court will give Plaintiff 30 days to pay the 21 filing and administrative fees or file a non-prisoner Application to Proceed in District Court 22 Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. The Court will also dismiss the Complaint and give 23 Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint that complies with the Local Rules of Civil 24 Procedure. 25 . . . . 26 . . . . 27

28 1 See Doc. 6 in CV-23-00367-TUC-RM and Doc. 5 in CV-23-01657-PHX-JAT (ASB). 1 I. Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court “may authorize the commencement . . . 3 of any suit . . . , without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits 4 an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses that the person 5 is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. Such affidavit shall state nature of the 6 action . . . and affiant’s belief that the person is entitled to redress.”2 The Court provides 7 an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs to assist 8 persons seeking to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will give Plaintiff 30 days from 9 the date this Order is filed to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative 10 fee or file a non-prisoner Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees 11 or Costs using the form included with this Order. 12 II. Complaint 13 Plaintiff’s Complaint does not name Defendants, allege a basis for this Court’s 14 jurisdiction, or comply with Rule 7.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, 15 the Court will dismiss the Complaint and give Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended 16 complaint. The Court will send Plaintiff a court-approved form to assist him in drafting an 17 amended complaint. 18 An amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 19 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 20 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint 21 as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the 22 original Complaint and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without prejudice 23 is waived if it is not alleged in a first amended complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 24 F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc).

25 2 “Numerous Courts of Appeal have held that, notwithstanding the term ‘prisoner’ 26 in the statute, section 1915(a) ‘applies to all persons applying for IFP status, and not just prisoners.’” Charov v. Perry, 2010 WL 3522270, *1 (D. Nev. 2010), citing Lister v. Dep’t 27 of Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005) (collecting cases from the Eleventh, Fifth, and Sixth Circuits so holding); see also Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 28 (9th Cir. 2007) (citing Lister and stating § 1915(a) “allows the district court to waive the fee, for most individuals unable to afford it, by granting IFP status.”) 1 III. Warnings 2 A. Address Changes 3 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 4 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 5 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 6 action. 7 B. Possible Dismissal 8 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 9 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d 10 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply 11 with any order of the Court). 12 IT IS ORDERED: 13 (1) Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the 14 $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee or file a non-prisoner Application to 15 Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs using the form included with 16 this Order. 17 (2) If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative 18 fee or file a non-prisoner Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees 19 or Costs within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this 20 action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. 21 (3) The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has 30 22 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint. 23 (4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of 24 Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without 25 prejudice. 26 (5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff the court-approved forms for filing a 27 civil rights complaint by a prisoner and a non-prisoner Application to Proceed in District 28 Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. 1 (6) The Clerk of Court must update Plaintiff's address to: 2 Quaraii Rashad Brumfield 3 2005 E. 36th St. Tucson, Arizona 85713. Dated this 23rd day of October, 2023.

'

g James A. Teilborg Senior United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law.

3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.

4. The Filing and Administrative Fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lister v. Department of Treasury
408 F.3d 1309 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
Andrews v. Cervantes
493 F.3d 1047 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
McMahon v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
896 F.2d 17 (Second Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brumfield v. Unknown Party, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brumfield-v-unknown-party-azd-2023.