Brown v. Triton Security

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Triton Security. Read the opinion of the Court — 172 F. App'x 520
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2006·No. 05-2318·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2318

DWIGHT C. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TRITON SECURITY; MIKE FINGERHUT; JOY APPLEBY, Vice President,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1544-1)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Abbey Gail Hairston, Jessica Regan Hughes, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Dwight C. Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v.

Triton Security, No. CA-04-1544-1 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19, 2005 &

entered Oct. 21, 2005). We grant Appellees’ motion to strike

Brown’s reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Triton Security, (4th Cir. 2006).

Brown v. Triton Security (Brown v. Triton Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.