Brown v. Triton Security
This text of Brown v. Triton Security (Brown v. Triton Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2318
DWIGHT C. BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TRITON SECURITY; MIKE FINGERHUT; JOY APPLEBY, Vice President,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1544-1)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwight C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Abbey Gail Hairston, Jessica Regan Hughes, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Dwight C. Brown appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v.
Triton Security, No. CA-04-1544-1 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19, 2005 &
entered Oct. 21, 2005). We grant Appellees’ motion to strike
Brown’s reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Triton Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-triton-security-ca4-2006.