Brown v. Triton Security

158 F. App'x 489
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Triton Security. Read the opinion of the Court — 172 F. App'x 520
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2005·No. No. 05-1759·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dwight C. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration and to “Subpoena Case and Employment Records.” This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Triton Security, 158 F. App'x 489 (4th Cir. 2005).

158 F. App'x 489 (Brown v. Triton Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)