Brown v. State

76 S.W.2d 774, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 930

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 Tex. Crim. 528 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 1934·No. No. 17063·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at confine■ment in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at confine■ment in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Brown v. State, 76 S.W.2d 774, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 930 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

76 S.W.2d 774 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.