Brown v. State

53 S.W.2d 1111, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 893
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 Tex. Crim. 528
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 19, 1932·No. No. 15628·Published

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

Robbery is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

[1112]*1112The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. We have perceived no departure from the legal procedure in the conduct of the trial. A postponement or continuance was sought because of the absence of certain witness, .but no bill of exception was preserved to the action of the court in refusing to continue the case. The motion for new trial presents no matters of law or fact that can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

Finding no error in the record authorizing a reversal, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 53 S.W.2d 1111, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 893 (Tex. 1932).

53 S.W.2d 1111 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.