Brown v. State

59 S.W.2d 159, 123 Tex. Crim. 483, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 15, 1933
DocketNo. 15693
StatusPublished

This text of 59 S.W.2d 159 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. State, 59 S.W.2d 159, 123 Tex. Crim. 483, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248 (Tex. 1933).

Opinions

MORROW, Presding Judge.

Theft, a misdemeanor, is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of twenty days.

The offense is sufficiently charged in the complaint and information. The trial was had before a jury. No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record.

There is a motion for new trial but in the absence of the statement of facts, the complaint of the rulings of the court cannot be appraised.

Finding no error presented for review, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Utsler v. State
195 S.W. 855 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Upton v. State
26 S.W. 197 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.W.2d 159, 123 Tex. Crim. 483, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.