Brown v. State
689 So. 2d 448, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2507, 1997 WL 121111
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1997·No. No. 96-3331·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm an order denying Appellant’s motion to correct sentence, but remand as to count III in ease number 92-0311 for modification to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement. As to that count, the ten year successive probation is to be strick[449]*449en from the sentence, is not required. Appellant’s presence
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 689 So. 2d 448, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2507, 1997 WL 121111 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
689 So. 2d 448 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. State
789 So. 2d 1114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)