Brown v. State

639 So. 2d 1136, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7510, 1994 WL 391045
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1994·No. No. 93-2414·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER-CURIAM.

The appellant received a penalty combining community control and incarceration, an unauthorized departure from the second cell of the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1069 (Fla.1994). We vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing.

Because it does not appear from the record that such a departure was intended when the sentence was initially imposed, the trial court on remand may depart from the guidelines upon providing valid written reasons. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990); State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989); Dyer v. State, 534 So.2d 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 639 So. 2d 1136, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7510, 1994 WL 391045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

639 So. 2d 1136 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. State
651 So. 2d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Garaguso v. State
648 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)