Brown v. State

231 S.W.3d 725, 365 Ark. 579
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 9, 2006
DocketCR 06-182
StatusPublished

This text of 231 S.W.3d 725 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. State, 231 S.W.3d 725, 365 Ark. 579 (Ark. 2006).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Ronald E. Brown, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Joseph P. Mazzanti, III, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. He explains that he failed to include in the order extending time within which to file the record a declaration pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. - Civ. 5(b)(1)(C)1 that all parties had the opportunity to be heard on the motion or waived such right. Because Mazzanti has admitted fault, this motion is granted pursuant to McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. State
197 S.W.3d 447 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)
McDonald v. State
146 S.W.3d 883 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 S.W.3d 725, 365 Ark. 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-ark-2006.