Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 10, 2017·No. 13-594·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS (Filed: March 15, 2017) No. 13-594V

* * * * * * * * * * * * * HAZEL BROWN, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * Decision Awarding Damages; * Complex Regional Pain v. * Syndrome (“CRPS”); Injury * to Shoulder; Arm Pain; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine. AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Danielle Strait, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Heather Pearlman, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Roth, Special Master:

On August 20, 2013, Hazel Brown [“Ms. Brown,” or “petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2 alleging that she received an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on October 1, 2010, and thereafter suffered pain in her

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

1 upper right arm. Petitioner alleged that she was subsequently diagnosed with injury to her shoulder as well as regional pain syndrome in her upper right extremity. See Petition at 1.

Respondent thereafter filed a report pursuant to Vaccine Rule 4(c) conceding that petitioner’s injury was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccination that she received on October 1, 2010, and that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Report at 3, ECF No. 17.

On February 5, 2014, Chief Special Master Dorsey issued a ruling on entitlement finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation. See Ruling on Entitlement, ECF No. 18.

Respondent filed a proffer on March 14, 2017, agreeing to issue the following payments:

(1) A lump sum of $526,333.10, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($54,413.72), lost earnings ($215,507.84), pain and suffering ($238, 074.05), and past unreimbursable expenses ($18,337.49), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Hazel Brown; and

(2) An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, described in section II.B of respondent’s proffer. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ proffer attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS _______________________________________ HAZEL BROWN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 13-594V ) Special Master Roth SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) ECF SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CNLCP, and

petitioner engaged Susan Guth, LCSW, CCM, and CLCP, to provide an estimation of Hazel

Brown’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine

related” is as described in the respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report, filed January 31, 2014, and the

Ruling on Entitlement, issued on February 5, 2014. All items of compensation identified in the

life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A:

Items of Compensation for Hazel Brown, attached hereto as Tab A. 1 Respondent proffers that

Hazel Brown should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and

illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.

1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment.

-1- B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Hazel Brown has suffered a

past loss of earnings and will suffer a loss of earnings in the future. Therefore, respondent

proffers that Hazel Brown should be awarded lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act,

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the appropriate award for Hazel

Brown’s lost earnings is $215,507.84. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that Hazel Brown should be awarded $238,074.05 in actual and

projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable

expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $18,337.49. Petitioner agrees.

E. Medicaid Lien

Petitioner represents that there are no Medicaid liens outstanding against her.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made

through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below,

and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2

2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

-2- A. A lump sum payment of $526,333.10, representing compensation for life care

expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($54,413.72), lost earnings

($215,507.84), pain and suffering ($238,074.05), and past unreimbursable expenses

($18,337.49), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Hazel Brown.

B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2017).

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a