Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided November 21, 2016·No. 14-850·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

******************** * LAWRENCE BROWN, * * No. 14-850V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: October 25, 2016 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating * Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) Respondent. * ******************** *

Ronald C. Homer and Lauren Faga, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, Boston, MA, for Petitioner; Julia W. McInerny, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On October 24, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Lawrence Brown on September 15, 2014. In his petition, petitioner alleged that the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which he received on October 14, 2011, caused him to suffer Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”). Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer GBS or any other injury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $425,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Lawrence Brown. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 14-850V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Dan Hoffman, at (202) 357- 6360.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 IN Tll E UN ITED STATES CC)l;tn OF FEDER.I\ I. C l. A l ~·1 S OF FI CE OF SPl-:C l.:\ I MASTF.RS

I .A WR ENCE BROW \:. 1.:1 -850\/ Spec ial !\,laster Mnran Petitioner. FCF \ .

SF.C RF.TARY OF ll EAl.TI I AN D l IUMAN SF.RV ICF.S.

_Respondent. _____, STIP t:J ,,\TIOI\

fh: pa11ies hcrehy stipulate to the fo lhi\\'ing ma1h: rs:

I. l.awn: nce Rrnwn (.. petitioner'"! !iku a petition ror vacc ine compensntion under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 42 U.S.C . § :rnoaa- 10 to 34 (the .. Vacc ine

Program" ). Petitioner seeks e<'mpcnsati1rn for injuries allegedly rel ated t~) the seasonal in lluen1a

(·· nu··i \'aCc ine. v. hich \·m:ci nc is cont<1incd in the Vaccine l nj ur~ Ta~l e (the·· l'ahk '"). 42 C'.1-. R.

~ I 00.> (a).

2. Petitioner received hi s ll u vaccine on Cktoher 1-L 20 11 .

:l. !"he vacc ine was adm inistered \\'ithin the United States.

4. Petiti oner alleges that he suffered Chro ni c lnllammat11ry Dcmyelinati ng.

Polyncuropath y (.. C IDP") as a result nl'his llu 1;ao.:ination. Petitioner lun her al leges that he

experienced the resiJual effects or this conditi on fo r more than six months.

S. Petitione r represents tht'l t there has been nn prior award or settlement nf a ci,·il

action ror damages as a result of his co ndition. 6. Respondent denies that the nu \'aCcinc caused pt:l itioncr's alleged (' fl)(> 1)r any other

injury nr his cu rrent cond ition.

7. Maintaining thei r ahc)\'e-statcd posit ions. th~ panics ncvcnhclcss now agree 1ha1 the issues bet\\'een them shal l he -;euled and thllt a decision slwuld he entered awarding 1he

c~Jm pcnsation (kscrihed in paragraph 8 of thi s Stipulation.

8. As soon as pract icuhlc after an entry of.iudgment rellect ing a decision consistent \Vith

the tenn s c,fthis Stipulation. and allc r petitioner has lih:d an election to n:ceivc cnmprnsati un

pursuant tn 42 ll.S.C. ~ .~OOaa-21(al( 1 ). the Secretary nf I !eallh and I luman Sen ices ,.,i ll is'.">ue

the followi ng vaccine compensation payment:

/\ lump sum or $425.000.00 in the form c,f a check payabk to petit ioner. Thi s amount represents compensation flir al l damngcs that woulOOaa-1 5(a) .

9. As Sl)On as prat: tic:able a fter the entry of judgment on entitlement in thi s case. and

after petitioner has 1iled both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. ~ >OOaa-2 l (a )( I). llnd an application . the parties " ·ill submit to furt her proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable al\orncys· ti:es and costs incum:d in proceedi ng

upon 1his petit ion.

I0. Petitioner and hi:- attorney rt:prcsent that 1hcy have idcnti lied to respondent all

knt)\\·I) sour~es or payment ror items or services fo r H"hich the Prngram is nOl primarily liahk under .t2 Ll.S .C. ~ 300aa-1 S(g l. including State compensation programs. insurance pol it:it's.

Federal or Stale health bcnelits programs (other than Title XIX ot" the Social Security /\ct (42

LI.S.C. ~ 1396 ct seq .)). or e n1i1ie ~ that pro,·ide health services on a pre-paid hasis.

11 . l'aymcnt made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation and any a11wun1s a\\'ar

pursuant Ill paragraph 9 wi 11 he made in accon.lance with 42 l '.S.C. ~ 300aa- 1)( il. subject 10 the

availa bi Ii ty () r SU f'tic ient stat ulor~ funds.

1~ - The parties and their allorneys further agree and stipulate that. except for any a''ard

fo r attorneys· fcc:s and litigation w~ts. and past unrcimhursed expenses. the monl'Y prO\·ided pursuant 10 this Sti pulution. \.Viii he uscJ S<'ldy for the bent: li t l'f petitioner as c0nkmplakd h~ a

strict construction or 4 2 l J.S.C. *.l00aa-l 5(a) anJ (cl). and subject to the conditions or 42 l.i .S.C.

~ 300aa-15( g) and (h ).

I J. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 9. petiti on.:r. in his

im.liYidunl capaci ty. and on hchal t' ot'hi s heirs. cxccuwrs. admi nistrators. successors or assi~n s .

docs fore\'cr irrc\'ocably and um:nnJitilmally release. m:quit nnd discharge the l Jnitcd States and

the Scc rctar~ orl lcalth and I luman Sen ices from any anJ nil aclit1ns or causes nr actio n (including agreements. .iudgmcnts. claims. damages. loss or services.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2016).

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a