Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided March 25, 2016·No. 13-766·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: March 4, 2016 Case No. 13-766V

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED I.H., a minor, by his mother * ALESKIS BROWN, * Chief Special Master Dorsey * Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages; * Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine; v. * Narcolepsy; Cataplexy; Hypersomnia; * Lack of Coordination/Ataxia. SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Michael G. McLaren, Black McLaren, et al., P.C., Memphis, TN, for petitioner. Darryl R. Wishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION1

On October 2, 2013, Aleskis Brown (“petitioner”) filed a petition on behalf of her minor son, I.H., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to - 34 (2012). Petitioner alleges that I.H. developed narcolepsy, cataplexy, hypersomnia, lack of coordination/ataxia, and other neurologic and physical impairments as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccination on December 10, 2012. Petition at 1. The undersigned determined

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. that the onset of petitioner’s condition began between January 6 and 8, 2013. See Ruling Regarding Findings of Fact dated August 4, 2015, (ECF No. 45).

On March 4, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation in which they stated that a decision should be entered awarding compensation.

Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused I.H.’s alleged injuries. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

A lump sum in the amount of $550,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Aleskis Brown, as guardian of I.H.’s estate. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation dated March 4, 2016, (ECF No. 58) at ¶ 8.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. I N THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIM S OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) I.I I.. a mino r. by his mother ) A L ES K I BROW . ) ) Petitio ner. ) o. 13-766V EC F ) V. ) Chief pecia l M aster Dorsey ) EC RETA RY OF H EA L TH ) A D HUMA SE RV ICES. ) ) Respondent. ) - - --------- )

STIPULAT ION

The partie hereby stipul ate to the fo llowin g matters:

I. Petitioner. A lcski s Brown. fi led a petiti on fo r vaccine compensation on behalfof her

on. I H. under the ational V acc ine Injury Compensati on Program. 42 U. .C. § 300aa- I 0 to 34

(the ··vacc ine Program .. ). The petition eeks compensati on for inj uri es alleged ly related to IH ·s

receipt o f the influenza ("" flu ..) vacc ine. w hich is contained in the V accine Inju ry Table (the

·T able.. ). 42 C.F .R. § I 00.3(a).

2. IH received the flu vaccine on D ecember I 0. 20 12.

3. The vaccine was admini stered w ithin the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that. as a re ult of receiv in g th e vacc ine. IH suffered from

narco lepsy. cataplexy. hyper omnia. lack o f coo rdinati on/atax ia. and neurologic and/or other

physica l impairm ents. and that II I experienced the residual effect o f these injuries for more than

six months.

5. Petitioner represent s that there has been no pri or award or settlement o f a civ il acti on for damages as a result o f the alleged injury .

6. Respondent denies that the vaccines caused or significan tly aggravated I H · s al Ieged

medical conditio n and injuries. any of hi ongoing symptoms. or any other injury.

7. Mainta ini ng thei r above-stated positions. the parti es nevertheless now agree that the

issues bet\\een them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered award ing the

compensatio n described in paragraph 8 o l" th is Sti pu lation.

8. As soon as prac ticab le after an entry o fjudgmcnt renecting a deci sion consistent

w ith the terms o f thi s Stipu lation. and after petit ioner has filed an election to rece ive

compensation pursuant to 42 U . .C. ~ 300aa-2 I (a)( I ). the Secretary of H ealth and I luman

Serv ices w ill issue the fo llowing vacc ine compensatio n pay ment:

A lum p sum o f$5 50.000.00. in the form of a check payab le to peti tioner as g uardian o f 11-l" s estate.

T he above amounts rep resent compensati on fo r al l damages that would be availab le under 42

U.S.C. * 300aa- 15(a) .

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on en ti tlement in thi s case. and

after petit ioner has fil ed both a proper and timely electi on to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U .S.C. *300aa-2 I (a)( I ). and an applica tion. the parti es wi 11 submit to further proceed in gs

before the special m aster to award reasonable attorneys · fee and costs incurred in proceeding

upon thi s petition.

I 0. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

th is Sti pulation i not for any items or servi ces for whi ch the Program is not primarily l iab le

under 42 U .S.C. * 300aa- I 5(g). to the exten t that payment has been made or can rca onably be

expected to be made under any State compensati on programs, insurance po licies. Federa l or

2 late health benefits programs (other than Title X IX o f the Social Security A ct (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)). or by entities that provide hea lth services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payments made pursuant to paragraph 8 o f thi s Stipulati on. and any amount

awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 o f thi s tipulation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2016).

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i)
§ 300aa-I
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-I
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a