Brown v. Mayor of Redlands
This text of 345 P.2d 75 (Brown v. Mayor of Redlands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner here attempts to appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the first amended petition for writ of mandate without leave to amend that pleading. This is not an appealable order. It does not appear that a judgment was entered dismissing or otherwise disposing of the action. No such judgment is contained in the record on appeal.
It has been uniformly held that an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not an appealable order or a final judgment and that a reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review an appeal of this type. (Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 149 Cal.App.2d 296 [308 P.2d 405]; Madsen [764]*764v. Turlock Irr. Dist., 56 Cal.App.2d 742 [133 P.2d 416]; Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 [252 P.2d 1].)
Appeal dismissed.
Shepard, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
345 P.2d 75, 174 Cal. App. 2d 763, 1959 Cal. App. LEXIS 1765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-mayor-of-redlands-calctapp-1959.