Home/California Supreme Court/Cole v. Rush

Cole v. Rush

252 P.2d 1, 40 Cal. 2d 178
California Supreme Court·Decided January 20, 1953·No. L. A. No. 22358·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinion

40 Cal.2d 178 (1953)

DOROTHEA COLE et al., Appellants,
v.
PAUL RUSH et al., Defendants; FRANK VAN STONE, Respondent.

L. A. No. 22358.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Jan. 20, 1953.

John C. Stevenson and Lionel Richman for Appellants.

Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and A. P. G. Steffes for Respondent.

THE COURT.

[1] This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. Such an order is nonappealable (Evans v. Dabney (1951), 37 Cal.2d 758, 759 [235 P.2d 604], and authorities there cited; 3 Cal.Jur.2d 476), and this court must, therefore, dismiss the appeal of its own motion. (Collins v. Corse (1936), 8 Cal.2d 123, 124 [64 P.2d 137]; Estate of Brady (1948), 32 Cal.2d 478, 480 [196 P.2d 881]; Rosenberg v. Knesboro (1947), 80 Cal.App.2d 36, 38 [180 P.2d 750]; see, also, 4 Cal.Jur.2d 337, and cases there cited.)

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. Rush, 252 P.2d 1, 40 Cal. 2d 178 (Cal. 1953).

252 P.2d 1 (Cole v. Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fregoso v. Eat Club CA6
California Court of Appeal, 2020
Katzenstein v. Chabad of Poway
237 Cal. App. 4th 759 (California Court of Appeal, 2015)
Ricard v. Grobstein, Goldman, Stevenson, Siegel, LeVine & Mangel
6 Cal. App. 4th 157 (California Court of Appeal, 1992)
Zappas v. King Williams Press, Inc.
10 Cal. App. 3d 768 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)
Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.
433 P.2d 732 (California Supreme Court, 1967)
Custodio v. Bauer
251 Cal. App. 2d 303 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. Clausen
248 Cal. App. 2d 770 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Galanis v. Mercury Internat. Ins. Underwriters
247 Cal. App. 2d 690 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Bledsoe v. Informative Research
247 Cal. App. 2d 684 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Russ v. Stiller
231 Cal. App. 2d 917 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)
Hohn v. Hohn
229 Cal. App. 2d 336 (California Court of Appeal, 1964)
West v. Cranmer
220 Cal. App. 2d 265 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Curnutt v. Holk
203 Cal. App. 2d 6 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Brown v. Mayor and City Council
345 P.2d 75 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Brown v. Mayor of Redlands
345 P.2d 75 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Carley v. City of Santa Rosa
315 P.2d 905 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Lavine v. Jessup
311 P.2d 8 (California Supreme Court, 1957)
Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
308 P.2d 405 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Rupley v. Winkler
304 P.2d 867 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Berri v. Superior Court
279 P.2d 8 (California Supreme Court, 1955)