Brown v. Mayor and City Council

345 P.2d 75, 174 Cal. App. 2d 763
California Court of Appeal·Decided October 27, 1959·No. Civ. No. 5751·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

174 Cal.App.2d 763 (1959)

WESLEY BROWN, JR., Appellant,
v.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 5751.

California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist.,

Oct. 27, 1959.

Thomas M. Eckhardt for Appellant.

Edward F. Taylor, City Attorney, for Respondent.

GRIFFIN, P. J.

[1] Petitioner here attempts to appeal from an order sustaining defendant's demurrer to the first amended petition for writ of mandate without leave to amend that pleading. This is not an appealable order. It does not appear that a judgment was entered dismissing or otherwise disposing of the action. No such judgment is contained in the record on appeal.

It has been uniformly held that an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not an appealable order or a final judgment and that a reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review an appeal of this type. (Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 149 Cal.App.2d 296 [308 P.2d 405]; Madsen *764 v. Turlock Irr. Dist., 56 Cal.App.2d 742 [133 P.2d 416]; Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 [252 P.2d 1].)

Appeal dismissed.

Shepard, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Mayor and City Council, 345 P.2d 75, 174 Cal. App. 2d 763 (Cal. Ct. App. 1959).

345 P.2d 75 (Brown v. Mayor and City Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines
187 Cal. App. 2d 44 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)