Brown v. CoreCivic Cimarron Corrections

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

QUINCY D. BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. CIV-23-650-HE ) CORECIVIC CIMARRON ) CORRECTIONS, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

Plaintiff Quincy D. Brown brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking relief for alleged constitutional violations during his incarceration at the Cimarron Correctional Facility. On October 31, 2024, U.S. Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the court grant defendants’ motion to dismiss, dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety without prejudice, and decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state claims, to the extent that he has raised any. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by November 22, 2024. No objection has been filed. Plaintiff has therefore waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the report. Cassanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #48], GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. #43], DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state law claims, and DISMISSES plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 9th day of December, 2024. lhe cote JO ATON ~D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE