Broome v. Horton
This text of 53 A.D.2d 1030 (Broome v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: This action is before us for the second time (see Broome v Horton, 47 AD2d 808). The third-party plaintiffs have repleaded their cause of action to allege that the third-party defendants are the infant plaintiffs grandparents, that [1031]*1031at the time of the accident the infant was under the care and control of the grandparents and that they were responsible for his welfare. The order denying the motion to dismiss the amended third-party complaint is affirmed for the reasons stated in the decision at Special Term, Smith, J. (see 83 Misc 2d 1002; see, also, Barrera v General Elec. Co., 84 Misc 2d 901). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Yates County—dismiss third-party . complaint.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 A.D.2d 1030, 386 N.Y.S.2d 156, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broome-v-horton-nyappdiv-1976.