Brooks v. State

113 S.W.2d 1247, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 899
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Tex. Crim. 526
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 23, 1938·No. No. 19503·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the liquor law by unlawfully having liquor in ■his possession for the purpose of sale when he only had a license for the sale of beer, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. Hence, the only matter presented for review is the sufficiency of the information to charge the offense of which appellant was convicted.

An examination thereof discloses that it is in due form and sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the dourt

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 113 S.W.2d 1247, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 899 (Tex. 1938).

113 S.W.2d 1247 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.