Brooks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Brooks v. State

83 S.W.2d 1116, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 591

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 S.W.2d 136 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 19, 1935·No. No. 17820·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The facts are very short, and are- ample to show- that appellant and another burglarized a dental office in the city of Lampasas and secured therefrom a quantity of dental gold, which was later sold by them.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The facts are very short, and are- ample to show- that appellant and another burglarized a dental office in the city of Lampasas and secured therefrom a quantity of dental gold, which was later sold by them.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Brooks v. State, 83 S.W.2d 1116, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 591 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

83 S.W.2d 1116 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.