Brooks v. State
This text of 113 S.W.2d 1247 (Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of violating the liquor law by unlawfully having liquor in ■his possession for the purpose of sale when he only had a license for the sale of beer, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. Hence, the only matter presented for review is the sufficiency of the information to charge the offense of which appellant was convicted.
An examination thereof discloses that it is in due form and sufficient.
The judgment is affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the dourt
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 S.W.2d 1247, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.