Brooks v. State
790 So. 2d 604, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10906, 2001 WL 871565
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 745 So. 2d 1113 →
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT
Pursuant to the mandate in Brooks v. State, 787 So.2d 831 (Fla.2001), we reconsider our previous opinion, Brooks v. State, 753 So.2d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), in light of Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000), and reinstate Brooks’ habitual offender enhancement sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. State, 790 So. 2d 604, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10906, 2001 WL 871565 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
790 So. 2d 604 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellis v. State
762 So. 2d 912 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Brooks v. State
753 So. 2d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
McKnight v. State
769 So. 2d 1039 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Cotton
769 So. 2d 345 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)