Brooks v. State

764 So. 2d 676, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6570, 2000 WL 690286
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2000·No. No. 4D99-2646·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FARMER, J.

We affirm defendant’s conviction for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling. The state adduced sufficient evidence of entry without permission to send the case to the jury.

Although defendant did not object to sentencing under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act, sentencing under an improper statute that imposes harsher punishment than would be applied under the proper statute is fundamental error. Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667 (Fla.2000). As we did in Robinson v. State, 766 So.2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we therefore reverse defendant’s PRR sentence because burglary of an unoccupied dwelling is not one of the qualifying offenses for such sentencing.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 764 So. 2d 676, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6570, 2000 WL 690286 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

764 So. 2d 676 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
762 So. 2d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Moore v. Moore
764 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)