Brooks v. State
456 So. 2d 1305, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15508, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2135
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1984·No. No. AW-329·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of a sentence imposed for armed robbery of a convenience store, asserting that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find the trial court did not err and we affirm. See Brooks v. State, 456 So.2d 1305, (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We certify the same question we did in that case.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. State, 456 So. 2d 1305, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15508, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2135 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
456 So. 2d 1305 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. State
456 So. 2d 1305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)