Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brooks v. State

442 So. 2d 333, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24520

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 456 So. 2d 1305 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 1983·No. No. 83-1236·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The appellant was convicted of aggravated battery. On appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a finding that a deadly weapon was used in the battery in question. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence of the use of “brass knuckles” is sufficient to sustain a finding that a deadly weapon was involved.

ANSTEAD, Acting Chief Associate Judge, and DOWNEY and WALDEN, Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The appellant was convicted of aggravated battery. On appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a finding that a deadly weapon was used in the battery in question. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence of the use of “brass knuckles” is sufficient to sustain a finding that a deadly weapon was involved.

ANSTEAD, Acting Chief Associate Judge, and DOWNEY and WALDEN, Associate Judges, concur.

Brooks v. State, 442 So. 2d 333, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

442 So. 2d 333 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.