Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brooks v. State

Brooks v. State

456 So. 2d 1305, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15508, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2135
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 1984
DocketNo. AW-329
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 456 So. 2d 1305 (Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. State, 456 So. 2d 1305, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15508, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2135 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a sentence imposed for armed robbery of a convenience store, asserting that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find the trial court did not err and we affirm. See Brooks v. State, 456 So.2d 1305, (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We certify the same question we did in that case.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, WENTWORTH and WIGGIN-TON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. State
456 So. 2d 1305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 So. 2d 1305, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15508, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.