Brooks v. State
241 So. 2d 182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5626 →
Opinion
The order denying appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside his conviction of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny, which was affirmed by this court on direct appeal [Brooks v. State, Fla.App., 172 So.2d 876 (1965)], is affirmed. See Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. State, 241 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
241 So. 2d 182 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harrington v. California
395 U.S. 250 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Brooks v. State
172 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)