Brooks v. State

264 So. 2d 469, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7730
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 1972·No. No. 72-357·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-[470]*470appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 264 So. 2d 469, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

264 So. 2d 469 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)