Broderick v. City of New York
This text of 268 A.D. 856 (Broderick v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and ■ disbursements. We hold that the action of the Budget Director in creating the additional positions involved herein without the specific approval of the Board of Estimate was not sanctioned by law. This renders it unnecessary for us to pass on the other questions at issue. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon. Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [182 Mise. 990.] [See post, p. 894.] In the Matter of Richard Welling, Respondent, against Patrick Walsh, as Commissioner of the Fire Department of the City of New York, et al., Appellants; Richard B. Haynes, Intervener, Defendant, and James W. 0. Wood et al, Interveners, Defendants-Appellants.— Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. We hold that the action of the Budget Director in creating the additional positions involved herein without the specific approval of the Board of Estimate was not sanctioned by law. This renders it unnecessary for us to pass on the other questions at issue. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See post, p. 894.] Anita M. Gardner et al., Appellants, v. Frank C. Shattdck Co., Inc., Respondent.— Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 856, 50 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1944.