Brito v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 10, 2024·No. 1:16-cv-07618·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------- □□ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 11-cr-576 (PKC) -against- ORDER ENRIQUE BRITO, Defendant. --------------- -- -- - - - ENRIQUE BRITO, Movant, 16-cv-7618 (PKC) -against-

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. ---------------- eX CASTEL, U.S.D.J.: Enrique Brito has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, accordingly, a certificate of appealability will not issue as to the denial of his section 2255 motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; see Blackman v. Ercole, 661 F.3d 161, 163-64 (2d Cir. 2011). This Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Opinion and Order of April 12, 2024 would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). SO ORDERED. A own P. Kevin Castel United States District Judge Dated: New York, New York June 10, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brito v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Brito v. United States (Brito v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Blackman v. Ercole
661 F.3d 161 (Second Circuit, 2011)