Brinson v. State
This text of 345 So. 2d 780 (Brinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court correctly denied appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal and for new trial.
However, the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of the crime of receiving stolen property is technically defective in that it fails to recite knowledge on the appellant’s part of the stolen character of the property. Windhurst v. State, 320 So.2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Spurlock v. State, 281 So.2d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for entry of a proper judgment.
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
345 So. 2d 780, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinson-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.