Windhurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Windhurst v. State

320 So. 2d 870, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15498

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 1975·No. No. 74-1477·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our consideration of the briefs and record convinces us that the appellate points posed for our consideration are without merit. See Richter v. State, 1969, 1 Tenn. Cr.App. 270, 438 S.W.2d 362, 364, and authorities cited therein.

We note however that the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of the crime of receiving stolen property fails to recite knowledge on the defendant’s part of the stolen character of the property. Spurlock v. State, Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 586.

Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for entry of a proper judgment.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Our consideration of the briefs and record convinces us that the appellate points posed for our consideration are without merit. See Richter v. State, 1969, 1 Tenn. Cr.App. 270, 438 S.W.2d 362, 364, and authorities cited therein.

We note however that the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of the crime of receiving stolen property fails to recite knowledge on the defendant’s part of the stolen character of the property. Spurlock v. State, Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 586.

Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for entry of a proper judgment.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Windhurst v. State, 320 So. 2d 870, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15498 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

320 So. 2d 870 (Windhurst v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related