Windhurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Windhurst v. State

320 So. 2d 870, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15498

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 3, 1975

DocketNo. 74-1477

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 320 So. 2d 870 (Windhurst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Windhurst v. State, 320 So. 2d 870, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15498 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our consideration of the briefs and record convinces us that the appellate points posed for our consideration are without merit. See Richter v. State, 1969, 1 Tenn. Cr.App. 270, 438 S.W.2d 362, 364, and authorities cited therein.

We note however that the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of the crime of receiving stolen property fails to recite knowledge on the defendant’s part of the stolen character of the property. Spurlock v. State, Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 586.

Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for entry of a proper judgment.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI