Bishop v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bishop v. State

366 So. 2d 540

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 25, 1979

DocketNo. KK-212

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 366 So. 2d 540 (Bishop v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bishop v. State, 366 So. 2d 540 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the record and briefs, we find no error in the revocation of probation. We note, however, that the judgment entered on the original charge of receiving stolen property did not recite the material element of knowledge that the property was stolen. Brinson v. State, 345 So.2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). The judgment is hereby amended to show a judgment and conviction of receiving stolen property with knowledge that the property was stolen and the judgment as amended is affirmed.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the record and briefs, we find no error in the revocation of probation. We note, however, that the judgment entered on the original charge of receiving stolen property did not recite the material element of knowledge that the property was stolen. Brinson v. State, 345 So.2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). The judgment is hereby amended to show a judgment and conviction of receiving stolen property with knowledge that the property was stolen and the judgment as amended is affirmed.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 So. 2d 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack