Bishop v. State
366 So. 2d 540
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 1979·No. No. KK-212·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Having reviewed the record and briefs, we find no error in the revocation of probation. We note, however, that the judgment entered on the original charge of receiving stolen property did not recite the material element of knowledge that the property was stolen. Brinson v. State, 345 So.2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). The judgment is hereby amended to show a judgment and conviction of receiving stolen property with knowledge that the property was stolen and the judgment as amended is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bishop v. State, 366 So. 2d 540 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
366 So. 2d 540 (Bishop v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eans v. State
366 So. 2d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)