Brennan v. Hoehmann
Opinion
' a ~ a nn a] | USDC SDNY | | DOCUMENT | | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ELECTRONICALLY FILED | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: □□□ □□□ □□□ nnn nnn nnn □□□ eee eee K | Fr □□□ amo | MATTHEW I. BRENNAN, || DATE Fi LED: 1 | 381300) | Plaintiff, -against- 19 CIVIL 11115 (VB) JUDGMENT TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN; CLARKSTOWN SUPERVISOR GEORGE HOEHMANN; CLARKSTOWN COUNCILMAN FRANK BORELLI; CLARKSTOWN BUILDING CODE TASK FORCE ATTORNEY LESLIE KAHN; CLARKSTOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN KEVIN HOBBS; and CLARKSTOWN CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER RAYMOND L. FRANCIS, Defendants. penne en eee en ene □□□ □□ nen ence nenenenen K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 27, 2020, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York July 28, 2020
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: ¥ L/VILA AQO Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brennan v. Hoehmann (Brennan v. Hoehmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.