Brennan v. Hoehmann

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | SLECTRONICALLY Brann | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK = wane nnnn en penne nena X i DATE PILED: | Ayah Plaintiff, : : ORDER GEORGE HOEHMANN, FRANK BORELLI, : 19 CV 11115 (VB) LESLIE KAHN, KEVIN HOBBS, and : RAYMOND L. FRANCIS, : Defendants. : ae ree ee ee en a tt 8 a at SK On December 4, 2019, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the original complaint. (Doc. #1), On December 20, 2019, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. #16). On December 26, 2019, plaintiff filed an amended complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). (Doc. #21), Accordingly, defendants’ motion to dismiss is terminated as moot. Defendants’ deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the amended complaint is January 16, 2020. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion (Doc. #16) and mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: December 27, 2019 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: (5 Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge