1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY BRAZEE, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00651-RBM-JLB Booking #23-2740, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION 14 WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT IMPERIAL COUNTY JAIL; 15 TO 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) IMPERIAL COUNTY JAIL STAFF;
16 IMPERIAL COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL [Doc. No. 2] STAFF; NURSE FRANCO, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff Gregory Allen Brazee, currently incarcerated at Imperial County Jail 21 (“ICJ”) in El Centro, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint 22 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (See 23 Doc. 1 (“Compl.”); Doc. 2 (“IFP”).) Plaintiff claims the ICJ and mostly unidentified 24 members of its medical staff, have failed to provide proper medical care for his infected 25 leg. (See Compl. at 2‒3, 5.) 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP 2 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 3 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 4 $405.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a failure to pay the entire 5 fee at the time of filing only if the court grants the Plaintiff leave to proceed IFP pursuant 6 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); 7 cf. Hymas v. U.S. Dep’t of the Interior, 73 F.4th 763, 765 (9th Cir. 2023) (“[W]here [an] 8 IFP application is denied altogether, Plaintiff’s case [cannot] proceed unless and until the 9 fee[s] [a]re paid.”). 10 To proceed IFP, prisoners must “submit[] an affidavit that includes a statement of 11 all assets [they] possess[,]” as well as “a “certified copy of the[ir] trust fund account 12 statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding 13 the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 14 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). Using this financial information, the court “assess[es] and when 15 funds exist, collect[s], … an initial partial filing fee,” which is “calculated based on ‘the 16 average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account’ or ‘the average monthly balance in the 17 prisoner’s account’ over a 6-month term; the remainder of the fee is to be paid in ‘monthly 18 payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s 19 account.” Hymas, 73 F.4th at 767 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)–(2)). In short, while 20 prisoners may qualify to proceed IFP without having to pay the full statutory filing upfront, 21 they remain obligated to pay the full amount due in monthly payments. See Bruce v. 22 Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 23 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 24 25 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative 26 fee of $55. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023). The additional $55 administrative fee does 27 not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. Id. 28 2 1 Here, Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP does not include a certified copy of his ICJ 2 trust account records for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his 3 Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2. Without these certified trust 4 account statements, the Court is unable to determine whether Plaintiff is eligible to proceed 5 IFP and cannot assess whether any initial partial filing fee is required to initiate the 6 prosecution of his case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 7 II. CONCLUSION 8 Accordingly, the Court: 9 (1) DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (Doc. No. 2); 10 (2) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice for failure to prepay the $405 11 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); 12 (3) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days from the date this Order in which to 13 re-open this case by either: (a) prepaying the entire $405 civil filing and administrative fee 14 in one lump-sum; or (b) filing a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a prison 15 certificate signed by an ICJ accounting official attesting as to his trust account balances 16 and deposits for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 17 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b);2 and 18
19 20 2 Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to re-open the case by either prepaying the full $405 civil filing fee, or by submitting a properly supported renewed Motion to Proceed 21 IFP, his Complaint will be subject to an initial review and may be dismissed sua sponte 22 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), regardless of whether he pays the full $405 filing fee at once, or is granted IFP status and is obligated to pay the 23 full filing fee in installments. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126‒27 (9th Cir. 2000) 24 (en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a 25 claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see also Rhodes v. Robinson, 26 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking redress from a governmental entity 27 or officer or employee of a governmental entity.”). 28 3 1 (4) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to mail Plaintiff a blank form “Motion and 2 ||Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis” for his use and 3 || convenience should he re-elect to proceed IFP in this Court. Ifhe does, Plaintiff is advised 4 ||to include S.D. Cal. Civil Case No. 24-cv-00651-RBM-JLB in the caption of his renewed 5 || Motion and/or any other subsequent document he wishes to file in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY BRAZEE, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00651-RBM-JLB Booking #23-2740, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION 14 WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT IMPERIAL COUNTY JAIL; 15 TO 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) IMPERIAL COUNTY JAIL STAFF;
16 IMPERIAL COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL [Doc. No. 2] STAFF; NURSE FRANCO, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff Gregory Allen Brazee, currently incarcerated at Imperial County Jail 21 (“ICJ”) in El Centro, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint 22 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (See 23 Doc. 1 (“Compl.”); Doc. 2 (“IFP”).) Plaintiff claims the ICJ and mostly unidentified 24 members of its medical staff, have failed to provide proper medical care for his infected 25 leg. (See Compl. at 2‒3, 5.) 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP 2 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 3 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 4 $405.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a failure to pay the entire 5 fee at the time of filing only if the court grants the Plaintiff leave to proceed IFP pursuant 6 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); 7 cf. Hymas v. U.S. Dep’t of the Interior, 73 F.4th 763, 765 (9th Cir. 2023) (“[W]here [an] 8 IFP application is denied altogether, Plaintiff’s case [cannot] proceed unless and until the 9 fee[s] [a]re paid.”). 10 To proceed IFP, prisoners must “submit[] an affidavit that includes a statement of 11 all assets [they] possess[,]” as well as “a “certified copy of the[ir] trust fund account 12 statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding 13 the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 14 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). Using this financial information, the court “assess[es] and when 15 funds exist, collect[s], … an initial partial filing fee,” which is “calculated based on ‘the 16 average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account’ or ‘the average monthly balance in the 17 prisoner’s account’ over a 6-month term; the remainder of the fee is to be paid in ‘monthly 18 payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s 19 account.” Hymas, 73 F.4th at 767 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)–(2)). In short, while 20 prisoners may qualify to proceed IFP without having to pay the full statutory filing upfront, 21 they remain obligated to pay the full amount due in monthly payments. See Bruce v. 22 Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 23 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 24 25 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative 26 fee of $55. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023). The additional $55 administrative fee does 27 not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. Id. 28 2 1 Here, Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP does not include a certified copy of his ICJ 2 trust account records for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his 3 Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2. Without these certified trust 4 account statements, the Court is unable to determine whether Plaintiff is eligible to proceed 5 IFP and cannot assess whether any initial partial filing fee is required to initiate the 6 prosecution of his case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 7 II. CONCLUSION 8 Accordingly, the Court: 9 (1) DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (Doc. No. 2); 10 (2) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice for failure to prepay the $405 11 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); 12 (3) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days from the date this Order in which to 13 re-open this case by either: (a) prepaying the entire $405 civil filing and administrative fee 14 in one lump-sum; or (b) filing a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a prison 15 certificate signed by an ICJ accounting official attesting as to his trust account balances 16 and deposits for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 17 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b);2 and 18
19 20 2 Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to re-open the case by either prepaying the full $405 civil filing fee, or by submitting a properly supported renewed Motion to Proceed 21 IFP, his Complaint will be subject to an initial review and may be dismissed sua sponte 22 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), regardless of whether he pays the full $405 filing fee at once, or is granted IFP status and is obligated to pay the 23 full filing fee in installments. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126‒27 (9th Cir. 2000) 24 (en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a 25 claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see also Rhodes v. Robinson, 26 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking redress from a governmental entity 27 or officer or employee of a governmental entity.”). 28 3 1 (4) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to mail Plaintiff a blank form “Motion and 2 ||Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis” for his use and 3 || convenience should he re-elect to proceed IFP in this Court. Ifhe does, Plaintiff is advised 4 ||to include S.D. Cal. Civil Case No. 24-cv-00651-RBM-JLB in the caption of his renewed 5 || Motion and/or any other subsequent document he wishes to file in this case. 6 Should Plaintiff fail to pay the $405 civil filing fee in full or complete and re-submit 7 || the renewed Motion to Proceed IFP provided together with the trust account certifications 8 required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) within 45 days, his case will remain dismissed without 9 || prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), and without further Order of the Court. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 ||Dated: April 17, 2024 Fe Le ? L □ 12 HON. RUTH BERMUDEZ MONTENEGRO 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3:24-cv-00651-RBM-JLB