Brantley v. Taylor
49 S.E. 262, 121 Ga. 475, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 203
This text of 49 S.E. 262 (Brantley v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brantley v. Taylor, 49 S.E. 262, 121 Ga. 475, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 203 (Ga. 1904).
Opinion
1. Assignments of error not referred to in the brief of the plaintiff in error will be considered as abandoned.
2. The Supreme Court will not disturb the first grant of a new trial upon certiorari from. a city court, when the verdict was not demanded by the evidence. Walker v. Hughes, 120 Ga. 1079.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Martin v. Thaxton
74 S.E. 1102 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Mathews v. Parker
52 S.E. 322 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Fokes v. Wells
51 S.E. 333 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 S.E. 262, 121 Ga. 475, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brantley-v-taylor-ga-1904.