Martin v. Thaxton

74 S.E. 1102, 11 Ga. App. 233, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 339
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 5, 1912·No. 3900·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The evidence did not demand the verdict rendered by the jury in the justice’s court, and the first grant of a new trial by the judge of the superior court upon- certiorari will not be disturbed. Bailey v. Hooks, 1 Ga. App. 276 (57 S. E. 924) ; Brantley v. Taylor, 121 Ga. 475 (49 S. E. 262). Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari; from Butts superior court — Judge R. T. Daniel. October 30, 1911. W. E. Watkins, for plaintiff in error. J. T. Moore, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Thaxton, 74 S.E. 1102, 11 Ga. App. 233, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 339 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

74 S.E. 1102 (Martin v. Thaxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brantley v. Taylor
49 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Bailey v. Hooks
57 S.E. 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)