Martin v. Thaxton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Martin v. Thaxton

74 S.E. 1102, 11 Ga. App. 233, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 339

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 5, 1912

Docket3900

StatusPublished

This text of 74 S.E. 1102 (Martin v. Thaxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Thaxton, 74 S.E. 1102, 11 Ga. App. 233, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 339 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The evidence did not demand the verdict rendered by the jury in the justice’s court, and the first grant of a new trial by the judge of the superior court upon- certiorari will not be disturbed. Bailey v. Hooks, 1 Ga. App. 276 (57 S. E. 924) ; Brantley v. Taylor, 121 Ga. 475 (49 S. E. 262). Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari; from Butts superior court — Judge R. T. Daniel. October 30, 1911.

W. E. Watkins, for plaintiff in error. J. T. Moore, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

The evidence did not demand the verdict rendered by the jury in the justice’s court, and the first grant of a new trial by the judge of the superior court upon- certiorari will not be disturbed. Bailey v. Hooks, 1 Ga. App. 276 (57 S. E. 924) ; Brantley v. Taylor, 121 Ga. 475 (49 S. E. 262). Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari; from Butts superior court — Judge R. T. Daniel. October 30, 1911.

W. E. Watkins, for plaintiff in error. J. T. Moore, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 S.E. 1102, 11 Ga. App. 233, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-thaxton-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack